麻豆村

麻豆村

To provide management of specific areas, we have created six committees, each of which includes equal representation from Pitt and 麻豆村. The members serve two- or three-year terms, rotating off in a staggered fashion to preserve continuity.

Committee Role Members
Curriculum Ensures that the curriculum of the training program remains current in terms of advances in modern computational biology.  The role of this committee is particularly important for our program, since computational biology is a rapidly evolving field.  Approves courses for inclusion as  life science electives.
  • Jim Faeder, Chair, Pitt
  • Russell Schwartz, Chair, 麻豆村
  • Dannie Durand, 麻豆村
  • Wayne Stallaert, Pitt
  • Sazan Mahbub, 麻豆村
  • Stephanie Masotti, Pitt
麻豆村s Handles all matters related to the recruitment of new high-quality students, including the evaluation of applicants. Prompt and careful evaluation of the candidates is their priority, along with the identification of candidates to be interviewed, shortly after the application deadline.
    • John Barton, Chair, Pitt
    • Richard Border, Chair, 麻豆村
    • Yu-Chih Chen, Pitt
    • Mert Gur, Pitt
    • Ramith Hettiarachchi, 麻豆村
    • Akash Kishore, Pitt
    • Dennis Kostka, Pitt
    • Young Je Lee, 麻豆村
    • Silvia Liu, Pitt
    • Jose Lugo-Martinez, 麻豆村
    • Jian Ma, 麻豆村
    • Sazan Mahbub, 麻豆村
    • Anamarie Martinez, Pitt
    • Steph Masotti, Pitt
    • Curtis McCloskey, Pitt
    • Christian Cuba Samaniego, 麻豆村
    • Maddie Shaklee, Pitt
    • Shike Wang, 麻豆村
    • Min Xu, 麻豆村
    • Yun William Yu, 麻豆村
    • Martin Zhang, 麻豆村
Executive Functions as a “Board of Directors” for the CPCB to provide oversight and advice on program development and management.  This committee has 8 members, including the program directors.
  • David Koes, Co-Director, Pitt
  • Carl Kingsford, Co-Director, 麻豆村
  • TBD, Associate Director, Pitt
  • Oana Carja, Associate Director, 麻豆村
  • Fritz Roth, Chair, Pitt
  • Russell Schwartz, Department Head, 麻豆村
Seminar Series
  • Christian Cuba Samaniego, 麻豆村
  • Nate Lord, Pitt
  • Nishat Anjum Bristy, 麻豆村
Graduate Student Assembly (GSA) - Appointments start on August 22nd CPCBGSA provides a link between its members and the faculty and administration of CPCB, represents and promotes the views of its members, and organizes social, academic, professional and other programs of interest to its members, also coordinating with the wider graduate student communities at the University of Pittsburgh and 麻豆村.
  • President: Emma Flynn
  • Vice President: Jane Siwek
  • Secretary of Student Affairs: Nishat Bristy
  • Pitt GSA rep: Achyudhan Kutuva
  • 麻豆村 GSA rep: Seo-Yoon Moon
  • Treasurer: Fareeda Abu-Abu-Juam
  • Social Media Manager: Maddie Shaklee
  • Ombudsperson: Alex DiBiasi
  • Outreach/Volunteer Coordinator: Gargi Kher
  • Senators: Seh Na Mellick, Sanjyot Shenoy, Akash Kishore, Jieni Hu
Professional Development  (Journal Club/Presentation/Meta School)
  • Joseph Ayoob, Pitt
  • Josh Kangas, 麻豆村
Steering  The Steering Committee is comprised of the Directors and Associate Directors at both Universities, both program managers, and two committee appointed senior-level students (students are only eligible if they’ve successfully completed all program course requirements and proposed their thesis).  The Steering Committee makes decisions specific to the CPCB Ph.D. program that does not require the attention of all the faculty and students
    • David Koes, Co-Director, Pitt
    • Carl Kingsford, Co-Director, 麻豆村
    • TBD, Associate Director, Pitt
    • Oana Carja, Associate Director, 麻豆村
    • Joseph Ayoob, Pitt
    • Nishat Anjum Bristy, 麻豆村
    • Kelly Gentille, Pitt
    • Jane Siwek, Pitt
    • Josh Kangas, 麻豆村
    • Nicole Stenger, 麻豆村

In addition to these specialized committees, all training faculty belong to, and participate in, the CPCB Program Faculty meetings held twice a year, at the end of the Fall and Spring semesters, and in an annual Program Retreat held off-site shortly after the arrival of each new class. The purpose of the Faculty meetings is the discussion of the programmatic issues brought about by the individual committees or other institutional developments, the evaluation of all students (discussed one by one), and the approval of the student evaluation letters that are to be sent to each student at the end of each semester.